The groups have filed a friend of the court brief saying the proposition violates the constitutional principles of equal protection and fundamental rights.
“Proposition 8 would shatter existing principles of equal protection and fundamental rights, as well as the judicial branch’s role as final arbiter of these constitutional guarantees,” said Russell S. Roeca, President of the Bar Association of San Francisco in a statement.
“It constitutes a revision of the Constitution. As such, it may not be enacted by a simple majority of the voters.”
Los Angeles County Bar Association President Danette Meyers said that the question of whether a protected class may be barred from enjoying a fundamental right based on a bare majority vote is a matter of statewide importance.
“The implications of the question are wide-reaching; if the majority can relegate disfavored minorities to second class citizenship via the initiative process, no fundamental rights are safe,” said Meyers.
The brief to the high court joins those of religious leaders and labor unions in making the argument that that Prop 8 is invalid because it is not a “constitutional amendment,” but a “constitutional revision.”
A revision requires a two-thirds vote of the Legislature to get on the ballot, while an amendment can go on the ballot as Prop 8 did through the collecting of signatures.
A coalition of more than 50 California labor organizations, including United Healthcare Workers and the California Labor Federation also filed its brief on Friday. In total, the labor organizations represent more than two million working men and women in California.
The California Council of Churches and other religious leaders and faith organizations representing millions of members filed their friend of the court brief earlier this week.
No comments:
Post a Comment