data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/931f8/931f8ec4b41ee79d16a8ecd91c4c96d9fa77e1ad" alt=""
The conservative Republican made the following statement during an interview with Orlando, Fla., radio station WORL on Sunday: "You see, the Massachusetts supreme court, when it started this move toward same-sex marriage, actually defined marriage — now get this — it defined marriage as simply 'the establishment of intimacy.' Now, how dangerous is that? I mean, I don't mean to be absurd about it, but I guess I can make the point of absurdity with an absurd point — I guess that would mean if you really had affection for your horse, I guess you could marry your horse. It's just the wrong way to go, and the only way to protect the institution of marriage is with that federal marriage amendment that I support."
No comments:
Post a Comment